[Sean Crago]

Holloway wrote: "My former employer required interviewers to walk  through
an entire script of such behavioral questions even when hiring for technical
positions."

That's really not a bad thing when balanced properly. Seems to work okay
when you kick the suits out of the room for a little bit, if you have time
for multiple interviews. (Which, of course, you should: Thirty/Sixty extra
minutes doesn't seem like much when compared with a TCO.... slavery's
illegal...... total cost of employment of probably $40-70k/anna for an
average sysadmin.) Anyone found a better way to balance it? Can testing
alone cover substantive knowledge issues, when forced into a system that
doesn't allow you the flexibility to do multiple interviews with multiple
themes?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20090608/b9433b72/attachment.htm>