Open Democracy

[David Nicol]

Some of them do that already, sort of. Which suggests two projects:

   - survey of deliberative bodies and the availability of their process
   artifacts (and what said artifacts are)
   - standardization

simply mandating "check it into git!" doesn't help a whole lot without
standardization which facilitates crafting of general tools.

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:31 AM Monty J. Harder <mjharder at gmail.com> wrote:

> The first thing we can get behind is having all deliberative bodies
> (Congress, state legislatures, city councils, school boards) put all of
> their work into Git repositories to which the general public has read-only
> access.  Every time a bill is amended should be a commit.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 3:23 PM Chris Bier <chris.bier at cymor.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I was listening to this EFF podcast about using technology to help
>> democracy be more open and wondering if there were any projects in MO and
>> KS. Does anyone know of any?
>>
>> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/02/podcast-episode-open-source-beats-authoritarianism
>> _______________________________________________
>> KCLUG mailing list
>> KCLUG at kclug.org
>> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>>
> _______________________________________________
> KCLUG mailing list
> KCLUG at kclug.org
> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>


-- 
"Lay off that whiskey, and let that cocaine be!" -- Johnny Cash
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20240305/c6314087/attachment.htm>