M$ Litigation against Linux
Jestin Stoffel
jestin.stoffel at gmail.com
Fri Oct 12 14:20:39 CDT 2007
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:25 -0700, Julie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of you may find the msg threads to this article a bit
> "interesting". ;)
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=833&tag=nl.e589
>
The conspiracy theory that Microsoft is behind this suit falls somewhere
between alarmist nonsense and obviousness. This could actually have
nothing to do with Microsoft, and just be a case that the patent trolls
thought they'd exploit. Of course, if this was brought about by
Microsoft, it adds a different twist. Would MS file a patent suit by
proxy against a company they have a patent deal with? Is that even
legal?
Adding my own little conspiracy theory, is Microsoft trying to
demonstrate the advantage of signing a patent deal with them? The idea
being that Novell will avoid lengthy litigation while RedHat will be
forced into a SCO style FUD case.
No matter what's really going on, it's more fuel for Microsoft's FUD
machine.
--Jestin
>
More information about the Kclug
mailing list