The List has returned! [x-adr]

[Hal Duston]

On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 13:48, Scott Smith wrote:
> I understand, and here is my explanation:
> 
> To me, open means open. If something is open in the manner in which we 
> use with "open source", then that means I can do whatever the hell I 
> want with it, no rules and no strings attached. 

In other words, "open" means "can be closed by someone else later".

Right?

Not "open" means "must remain open for all time".

Right?

--
Hal