On Friday 12 October 2007, you wrote:
On 10/12/07, Luke -Jr luke@dashjr.org wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On 10/12/07, Jestin Stoffel jestin.stoffel@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:25 -0700, Julie wrote:
Some of you may find the msg threads to this article a bit "interesting". ;)
The conspiracy theory that Microsoft is behind this suit falls somewhere between alarmist nonsense and obviousness.
It could just be a coincidence that this happened right on the heals of Balmer's latest threats. And it could just be a coincidence that the patent holder if isn't also suing Microsoft.
Microsoft doesn't violate it, unless that's something new in Vista.
Aren't we talking about virtual desktops? Or did I misunderstand the scope of the patent?
Indeed, a concept foreign to Windows.